Study Guides/AWS Cybersecurity Notes/Parsing logs and events: Difference between revisions
From Cramsession
Jump to navigationJump to search
✍️ Verified Author: Mflavell • Click to view professional profile & credentials
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
= | = Storing logs in S3 = | ||
The obvious solution. | The obvious solution. | ||
Revision as of 23:43, 7 June 2026
Important points to consider
- Build a resillant storage solution.
- Store log files centrally.
- Ensure integirity is maintained.
- Know retention policies.
- Know the process for adding new logs.
- Who to grant read access to.
- Monitor storage.
Storing logs in S3
The obvious solution.
- Provdies resiliant long term storage for data.
- The problem with S3 is the ability to search files - it's just a file system not an RDB.
S3 has several storage tiers
S3 Standard
- Highly available but most expensive.
- Ideal for requent access to logs.
- 99.99% avalability and 99.999999999% ( 5 9's ) diability.
- Can encrypt data at rest or in transit (SSL).
Standard Infrequent access
- Designed for files >128kb
- If a file is less than 128 kb your charged for 128 kb - not a big deal unless you have lots of small files.
- Designed for extended storage peroids >30 days - Minimum charge is 30 days.
- Storage is lower cost but there are higher charges for actions (GET / PUT / COPY / POST / LIST / SELECT).
- No delays to access objects - realtime access.
- basically the same as S3 Standard but lower storage costs / ideal for infrequent access.
S3 One Zone IA
- Lowest cost point.
- Same as Standard IA but only in one zone.
- Ideal if you are already replicating the data.
- Risk of data loss - all your data is on One Zone.
- Resillancey and avlability is the same.
S3 Glacier Instant
- Raipid access to data.
- 68% cost savings over S3 standard
- Same 128 kb minimum charge.
- One AZ can be destroyed without data loss.
- Same Resillanacy and avalability.